Blink Commerce Pvt. Ltd. Vs. Blinkhit Pvt. Ltd. & Anr.
In allowing an appeal by the popular delivery App Blinkit, the appellate court noted that non- use by the Respondent- plaintiff / registered proprietor of a mark since registration in 2016 bars its claims of an injunction against the user of the Appellant – defendant’s mark.
The material on record also indicates that the non-use of the registered trademarks … from 2016 onwards coupled with the undisputed fact that the nature of …business… by the respondent – plaintiff is completely different from … the appellant -defendant was sufficient to come to the conclusion that the balance of convenience was in favour of the appellant…
As per the rules of the Bar Council of India, law firms are not permitted to solicit work and advertise. Please agree to accept that you are seeking information of your own accord and volition and that no form of solicitation has taken place by the Firm or its members. The information provided under this website is solely available at your request for information purposes only. It should not be interpreted as soliciting or advertisement.